Press Complaints Commission
spacer spacer
SEARCH FOR     Or try the cases search  
See the search help for assistance in using this tool

Search Results For: (770 Results Found)
 
arrow_right First | arrow_right Prev | Now displaying 171 - 180 | arrow_right Next | arrow_right Last
(171)A woman (The Gazette (Renfrewshire))

A woman complained to the Press Complaints Commission that a court report of October 2009, published in The Gazette (Renfrewshire), had included her name and home address in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(172)Viscount Monckton of Brenchley (The Guardian)

Viscount Monckton of Brenchley complained to the PCC that a blog on the Guardian website, headlined ‘Has UKIP got more than it bargained for in recruiting Viscount Monckton?' contained inaccurate information in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors' Code of Practice and discriminated against him in breach of Clause 12 (Discrimination).

(173)A woman (Loaded)

A woman complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined 'Wanted! The Epic Boobs girl!', published in the February 2010 edition of Loaded, intruded into her privacy in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(174)A man (Oxford Mail)

A man complained to the PCC that the publication of his name and location in a letter, headlined 'Life at Royal Mail', published in the Oxford Mail on 2 November 2009, had failed to protect him as a confidential source of information in breach of Clause 14 (Confidential sources) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(175)St Andrew's Healthcare (Daily Gazette)

St Andrew's Healthcare complained to the Press Complaints Commission through Morgan Cole Solicitors that an article headlined 'Why weren't we warned?', published in both The Echo and the Daily Gazette on 30 September 2009, contained inaccuracies and was based on material acquired by the unauthorised removal of documents in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) and Clause 10 (Clandestine devices and subterfuge) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(176)St Andrew's Healthcare (The Echo (Basildon))

St Andrew's Healthcare complained to the Press Complaints Commission through Morgan Cole Solicitors that an article headlined 'Why weren't we warned?', published in both The Echo and the Daily Gazette on 30 September 2009, contained inaccuracies and was based on material acquired by the unauthorised removal of documents in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) and Clause 10 (Clandestine devices and subterfuge) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(177)A woman (Scottish Sun)

A woman complained to the PCC that an article published in the Scottish Sun on 14 November 2009, headlined 'Lying dad caged', contained inaccuracies in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) and identified her in breach of Clause 11 (Victims of sexual assault) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(178)A married couple (The Sun)

A married couple complained that two articles published in The Sun contained inaccuracies in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) and intruded into their daughter's private life in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(179)Mr Oli Bird (The Spectator)

Mr Oli Bird of London complained to the Press Complaints Commission that a blog posting on the Spectator's website, published on 5 December 2009, contained inaccurate information in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(180)A woman (Leicester Mercury)

A woman complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined 'Tender arm of the law', published in the Leicester Mercury on 12 December 2009, contained a photograph of her daughter which was published without consent in breach of Clause 6 (Children) of the Editors' Code of Practice.



[ Home ] [ Cases ] [ Site map ]